Page 1 of 2
Two new features
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 6:54 pm
by Andrew Lee
Two new features have been implemented:
1) The "Alternatives" field
request by spicydog is now online. For examples, see
this and
this.
2) guiness
wants a way to count his submissions with the new website design. He can easily do it now with:
"[@guiness]" = return all guiness' submissions
"[#guiness]" = return all guiness' private submissions
Here's a summary of _all_ the special search commands currently available:
"[@]" = return all public + private entries
"[#]" = return all private entries only
"[username]" = return all username's favorites
"[@username]" = return all username's public + private submissions
"[#username]" = return all username's private submissions
Re: Two new features
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 7:21 pm
by lautrepay
Great! Thanks!
Is it already implemented? I get "guiness's submissions (0)" when I search for "[@guiness]".
If I search for "[@lautrepay]" I get the entries that I recently updated.
Re: Two new features
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:25 pm
by Andrew Lee
Is it already implemented? I get "guiness's submissions (0)" when I search for "[@guiness]".
If I search for "[@lautrepay]" I get the entries that I recently updated.
Should be working now. Please try again.
Re: Two new features
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:36 am
by tproli
Perhaps this block could be added to the Detailed Search page, under the Search button.
Code: Select all
"[@]" = return all public + private entries
"[#]" = return all private entries only
"[username]" = return all username's favorites
"[@username]" = return all username's public + private submissions
"[#username]" = return all username's private submissions
Re: Two new features
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 2:56 am
by Firewrath
Andrew Lee wrote:Is it already implemented? I get "guiness's submissions (0)" when I search for "[@guiness]".
Should be working now. Please try again.
I'm getting this too. Maybe guiness has too many submissions for the system to handle.
But if I do "[@Firewrath]", it seems to work. O_o
(Not that I've submitted much >.>)
Re: Two new features
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:23 am
by guinness
It's because my user name is guinness! People always forget the second n.
Thanks for adding Andrew, I had no idea you had added 288+ applications to the database.
Re: Two new features
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:44 am
by Firewrath
Rofl... ^-^;;
I blame Andrew! I just used what he had!
Andrew Lee wrote:
"[@guiness]" = return all guiness' submissions
"[#guiness]" = return all guiness' private submissions
Re: Two new features
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:02 am
by lautrepay
Andrew Lee wrote:Is it already implemented? I get "guiness's submissions (0)" when I search for "[@guiness]".
If I search for "[@lautrepay]" I get the entries that I recently updated.
Should be working now. Please try again.
Working fine now, thanks!
Firewrath wrote:Rofl... ^-^;;
I blame Andrew! I just used what he had!
Andrew Lee wrote:
"[@guiness]" = return all guiness' submissions
"[#guiness]" = return all guiness' private submissions
Lol I did the same
Re: Two new features
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:08 am
by Midas
Great features. TPFC keeps getting better.
Re: Two new features
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:16 am
by lautrepay
And who are the Top 10?
Some candidates: Andrew Lee, guinness, Fluffy, I am Baas, Checker, AlephX, joby_toss, technicolordreamcoat.
Re: Two new features
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 5:34 am
by Checker
Great additions
... Thanks Andrew
Re: Two new features
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 6:09 am
by Checker
If I search with
[@Checker] the entries for
- CurrProcess [25]
- ExeInfo [15]
- Access PassView [11]
- Celestia Portable [20]
are flagged "Private"
Re: Two new features
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 5:39 pm
by Andrew Lee
tproli wrote:Perhaps this block could be added to the Detailed Search page, under the Search button.
But these are features I don't want the casual passerby to use.
Checker wrote:If I search with [@Checker] the entries for
- CurrProcess [20]
- ExeInfo [15]
- Access PassView [11]
- Celestia Portable [20]
are flagged "Private"
These are unflagged, no? Public entries that are older than 3 months are unflagged. Private entries will always be marked "Private", regardless of age.
Re: Two new features
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 1:56 am
by Checker
Andrew Lee wrote:These are unflagged, no? Public entries that are older than 3 months are unflagged. Private entries will always be marked "Private", regardless of age.
No, they are flagged
"Private", but they shouldn't, that's why I added the voting points.
If you search them direct, every thing is o.k., but if you search with "
[@Checker]" (selection: 5 per page) you will find them on page 13 all flagged with "Private"
Re: Two new features
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 6:59 am
by SYSTEM
Checker wrote:Andrew Lee wrote:These are unflagged, no? Public entries that are older than 3 months are unflagged. Private entries will always be marked "Private", regardless of age.
No, they are flagged
"Private", but they shouldn't, that's why I added the voting points.
If you search them direct, every thing is o.k., but if you search with "
[@Checker]" (selection: 5 per page) you will find them on page 13 all flagged with "Private"
Confirmed. In addition, I found another problem: the list includes InjectedDLL which is a private entry. However, it's flagged as "Updated".